A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories - Eric Salter
This is fantastic! Honest analysis and candid commentary about the evidence, those who promote these hypotheses, and the many reasons why. This is the culmination of a long-running debate within the movement about unity vs. science. The author is rightly concerned that the movement will be divided into responsible gatekeepers, and knee-jerk die-hards, with few left who see the middle path.
TruthMove sits in this reasonable middle space in which responsible inquiry, and an uncompromising assertion of reality are inseparable. There is a hierarchy of methodology with which one discerns the truth. Those who think that no planes hit the WTC aren't respecting the evolution of logic throughout our history, nor the essential foundations of our criminal justice system.
The author was brave in publishing this article, as those who desire unity over quality are sure to be highly critical, and ironically, even downright nasty. And yet the development of the movement requires that some hold that middle ground, and demand accountability from both sides.
If you are not interested in his specific findings, skip to the conclusion and commentary at the bottom.