Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

The 9/11 Phone Calls: Disturbing Irregularities Uncovered ? (2 posts)

  1. truthmod
    Administrator

    Any legitimacy to these claims? I never knew what to think about this stuff...

    http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20130520...


    These and other reported calls have now been examined by the 9/11 Consensus Panel of scientists, pilots, professors, attorneys, and journalists.

    The Panel began its research in 2011 with the Twin Towers and the sudden, stunning collapse of adjacent Building WTC7, a massive 47-storey steel-framed skyscraper.

    The official conclusion that all 82 support columns failed simultaneously from fire alone has for years raised serious questions about the official account.

    The 9/11 Consensus Panel now offers four evidence-based Points about the alleged phone calls from the 9/11 flights.

    The famous "let's roll" drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer's 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephone supervisor Lisa Jefferson, who reported Beamer as strangely tranquil, declining to speak to his wife. Eerily, Beamer's line remained open for 15 minutes after the crash.

    Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer's cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.

    Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.

    Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.

    During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."

    Posted 10 years ago #
  2. mark
    Member

    In a word, NO.

    It's just a long standing campaign to piss off the family members and ensure they never, ever want to work with the "truthers," since it's calling the family members liars or dupes for claiming they talked with their relatives on the doomed planes. Offensive is an understatement.

    Meanwhile, this alleged "consensus panel" and similar stunts never talk about the suppressed warnings, the plane into building wargame during the attack or why the No Such Agency didn't use its super sophisticated Presidential warning system to tell Bush what was going on.

    Brainwash, rinse, repeat.

    Posted 10 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.