Kevin Ryan's new book has been endorsed by Bob McIlvaine and Lorie Van Auken.
I kind of wrote Ryan off when he endorsed Barrett's congressional campaign in 2008, 'cause I figured Ryan was close enough geographically that he should have known Barrett for what he is. So I paid little attention to Ryan's work over the years as he shifted from his original science-of-9/11 orientation to an identifying-the-conspirators quest. Out of a sense of duty I skimmed his articles, but I have little patience for this kind of thing, which inevitably winds up ascribing great significance to relationships that often can only be assumed, and rarely proven, to be significant. I suspect that there's a great danger that at some point the tireless and compulsive researcher must succumb to his own circular reasoning and confirmation bias---that after enormous labors to find out that some government bureaucrat's brother-in-law once sat on a board with a guy who sat on another board of a military contractor, our heroic researcher is likely to ascribe significance to the fact in proportion to the labor he put in, getting the fact.
I wonder if anybody here has looked into Mr. Ryan's material. His name is invoked as a source for research for the Youtube "9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)" that has gotten 500,000 views.