Sorry, but I have to at least mention this predictable stuff. Maybe there's some validity to it, maybe not.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/conspiracy-theories-run...
Good old Kevin Barrett seems to be one of the first to jump on this bandwagon:
http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2015/01/paris-charl...
Barrett can be right sometimes. His "Questioning the War on Terror" book was 95% right. The problem is the 5% fecal content in his punch that makes everybody's punch seem ooky.
That's the way infiltrators work. There is nothing good about Barrett or anything he has ever done.
Our tax dollars are hard at work.
Julian Assange's comments - best I've seen this week
Good questions.
Among the author’s questions are: Why weren’t the Kouachi brothers, both known to have extremist ties, not under surveillance?; Why were the Charlie Hebdo offices not better protected, given that the magazine regularly and strongly criticizes Islam?; and just how did two known terrorists get hold of semi-automatic weapons?
“Cherif Kouachi, had already been convicted of terrorism offences and served 18 months in prison for it. Both brothers were already on terrorism lists. Far from hiding messages under rocks or using encryption, the alleged conspirators communicated hundreds of times before and during the attacks — on regular phones.â€
You must log in to post.