Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Tracking Right-Wing / Libertarian COVID Sources (10 posts)

  1. truthmod
    Administrator

    There is most definitely a well-funded, widespread movement to use COVID skepticism to advance extreme right-wing libertarian aims to roll back governmental power and social programs. We can argue about whether this a good thing or not, but these groups and individuals are on the side of unbridled capitalism and corporate power. The anarcho-capitalists may see this as their dream opportunity to destroy faith in government. I have no faith in government either, but I don't trust these people to be the planners of what comes next.

    These people think that the WEF is a communist one world government plot. They may have genuine ideals regarding liberty, freedom of speech, privacy, etc., but they are followers of Mises and Rand. Is their kind of dog eat dog liberty what we really want? Or maybe we do have some meaningful overlap in values?

    Whatever the reality of the COVID situation, I think this is an important group to keep track of.

    https://brownstone.org/

    The Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research is a nonprofit organization founded May 2021 (501c3 applied). Its vision is of a society that places the highest value on the voluntary interaction of individuals and groups while minimizing the use of violence and force including that which is exercised by public authority. This vision is that of the Enlightenment that elevated learning, science, progress, and universal rights to the forefront of public life, and is newly threatened by ideologies and systems that would take the world back before the triumph of the ideal of freedom.

    The mission of the Brownstone Institute – which is, in many ways, the spiritual child of the Great Barrington Declaration – is constructively to come to terms with what happened, understand why, discover and explain alternative paths, and prevent such events from happening again. Lockdowns have set a precedent in the modern world and without accountability, social and economic institutions will be shattered once again. Brownstone Institute is essential in preventing the recurrence of lockdowns by holding decision makers intellectually to account. In addition, the Brownstone Institute hopes to shed light on a path to recovery from the devastating collateral damage, while providing a vision for a different way to think about freedom, security, and public life.

    Founder and President

    Jeffrey Tucker, Author/Editor

    Jeffrey A. Tucker is Founder and President of the Brownstone Institute and the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and ten books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker

    Jeffrey Albert Tucker (/?t?k?r/; born December 19, 1963) is an American economics writer of the Austrian School, an advocate of anarcho-capitalism and Bitcoin, a publisher of libertarian books, a conference speaker, and an internet entrepreneur.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mises_Institute

    From 1997 to 2011 Tucker worked for the Mises Institute, of which Rockwell was a co-founder, as editorial vice president and editor for the institute's website, Mises.org. From 1999 to 2011 he also contributed scholarly efforts and humorous essays to LewRockwell.com.[6]

    Senior Scholars

    Jayanta Bhattacharya, Stanford University
    Donald Boudreaux, George Mason University
    Gigi Foster, University of New South Wales
    George Gilder, Author
    Martin Kulldorff, Harvard University
    John Tamny, Author

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. truthmod
    Administrator

    The Great Barrington Declaration

    https://gbdeclaration.org/

    img

    American Institute for Economic Research https://www.aier.org/

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. mark
    Member

    Some of those people also predicted there would be between five thousand and ten thousand dead in the USA from covid. Reminds me of the magazine SOVIET LIFE which ran a profile of the Chernobyl reactor complex in February 1986 predicting a meltdown could only happen once in ten thousand years. (Two months before Chernobyl 4's accident.)

    The town of Great Barrington passed a resolution denouncing the declaration that dishonored their town.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. mark
    Member

    Instead of "Don't Tread on Me," perhaps the new slogan could be "Don't Cough on Me"

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. mark
    Member

    Also, this is a Koch family funded operation.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. truthmod
    Administrator

    Please post links, if you can. I found this, by our old 9/11 compatriot, Nafeez Ahmed:

    The ‘think-tank’ behind the Great Barrington Declaration is part-funded by right-wing American billionaire Charles Koch, reports Nafeez Ahmed
    https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science...

    Founders of Koch-Backed COVID Disinformation Organisation Bankroll New Cross-Party Parliamentary Group
    https://bylinetimes.com/2021/10/07/founders-of-koc...

    https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/10/15/great-b...

    The BMJ attempt to link us to the Koch brothers is an ad hominem attack of the highest order, but failed to mention much closer connections. We all work for universities that have received donations from Koch Foundations, although unrelated to any of our own work. While the AIER has received only a single $68K (£50,000) Koch donation a few years ago, many universities have received multiple, much larger Koch donations, including million dollar gifts to Duke,Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Stanford. Since university staff frequently publish in the BMJ, the journal is arguably more closely connected to a ‘network of organisations funded by Charles Koch’ than the AIER.

    Covid-19 and the new merchants of doubt
    https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/09/13/covid-19-and-...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. truthmod
    Administrator

    G. Edward Griffin is getting a lot of play these days. Chris Martenson is a booster of his. He seems to be getting love from the vaccine and COVID skeptics. He wrote "The Creature from Jekyl Island" about the Federal Reserve. His analysis of the Fed seems legitimate to me, but I'm no expert on the issue. He has now crossed over into the alternative medicine world.

    He even did an appearance on the Cabin Talk YT channel:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc-aqxbOgSo

    She has gotten a big audience after her prophetic video predicting the pandemic and adult mandatory vaccines in September 2019:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV9Rl6d2Mys

    Griffin is a major John Birch guy. Here he responds to questions / doubts regarding his association with the JBS:

    https://freedomforceinternational.org/was-griffin-...

    I can understand how mention of my association with The John Birch Society may cause some people to raise an eyebrow. The general impression among many is that the Society is an extremist organization made up of kooks, McCarthyites, and racists. So let me jump to the bottom line.

    I am a life member of The John Birch Society and, for several years in the 1960s, served on the Society’s staff as a Major Coordinator and official spokesman. From over forty years of personal contact with its members and leadership, I can say with authority that the Society is an excellent educational organization promoting limited government and opposing collectivism in all of its forms. There is nothing about it that is contrary to the highest standards of morality and ethical conduct.

    Here is Griffin's Red Pill Expo:
    https://redpillexpo.org/

    It looks like a MAGA Fest to me.

    G EDWARD GRIFFIN (April 3, 1969) MORE DEADLY THAN WAR THE COMMUNIST REVOLUTION IN AMERICA
    https://vimeo.com/452991577

    G Edward Griffin - The Grand Design: The Hidden Plan That Shapes US Foreign Policy (1968) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gIRPYZN0OU

    He is also the author of " World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 "

    https://3lib.net/book/948474/f715aa?dsource=recomm...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. truthmod
    Administrator

    If we're going to talk about the Koch brothers funding things. It seems only right to talk about The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, right?

    img

    Bill Gates is recognized as the TOP or SECOND leading funder of the WHO. He's up there right next to the US and UK governments:

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. truthmod
    Administrator

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/covid-lockdown...


    The GBD, which I wrote, together with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya at Stanford and Dr. Sunetra Gupta at Oxford, argues for focused protection. Rather than a blanket lockdown which inflicts so much harm on society, we wanted better protection of those most at risk – mindful that Covid typically poses only a mild risk to the young. For saying so, we are smeared as 'the new merchants of doubt' – as if scepticism and challenge is regarded by the BMJ as something to be condemned.

    The BMJ article is full of errors that ought to have never found their way into any publication. Here are some examples:

    My colleagues and I are described as ‘critics of public health measures to curb Covid-19’. On the contrary, throughout the pandemic we have strongly advocated better public health measures to curb Covid-19 – specifically protection of high-risk older people, with many ‘clearly defined’ proposals. The failure to implement such measures, in our view, has led to many unnecessary Covid deaths.

    We are described as ‘proponents of herd immunity’ which is akin to accusing someone of being in favour of gravity. Both are scientifically established phenomena. Every Covid strategy leads to herd immunity. The key is to minimise morbidity and mortality. The language, here, is non-scientific: herd immunity is not a creed. It’s how pandemics end.

    It says we have ‘expressed opposition to mass vaccination’. Dr. Gupta and I have spent decades on vaccine research and we are all strong advocates for Covid and other vaccines. They are among the greatest inventions in history. To falsely credit the anti-vaccine movement with support from professors at Harvard, Oxford and Stanford is damaging for vaccine confidence. This is unworthy of a medical journal.

    The GBD is referred to as a 'sophisticated science denialism’. Note here how something that challenges an orthodoxy is described as anti-science – a label that presumably could have been applied to any scientific innovator who ever questioned a failed orthodoxy. Collateral public health damage from Covid restrictions are real and enormous on cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, backsliding childhood vaccinations, starvation and mental health, just to name a few. It is not the GBD, but those who downplay lockdown harms who should be equated with those who question the harms of tobacco or climate change.

    The GBD was not ‘sponsored by the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) – and I’m pleased to see that the BMJ has at least retracted this claim. We were there for media interviews, with no sponsorship. How did such a blunder end up in print in the first place? The AIER staff did not even know about the Declaration until the day before it was signed, and the AIER president and board did not know about it until after publication. If we had written the Declaration at say, Starbucks, would the BMJ have claimed that it was sponsored by the coffee shop?

    The BMJ article mentions ‘AIER contributor Scott Atlas’, but Dr. Atlas has never been affiliated with nor written for AIER. Neither have we – unless the BMJ also views us as affiliated with hundreds of universities and organisations that we have visited during our careers or that have reprinted some of our articles. Dr. Atlas was not even aware that AIER had reprinted one of his articles until the BMJ linked to it. Several AIER employees have gracefully supported the GBD, just like countless other people around the world, but we have never received any money from the AIER. This basic error again exposes how normal checks did not appear to have been applied by the BMJ.

    The BMJ article ends by saying that my colleagues and I are peddling a 'well-funded sophisticated science denialist campaign based on ideological and corporate interests'. Nobody has paid us money for our work on the GBD, or for advocating focused protection. None of us would have undertaken this project for professional gain: it is far easier to stay silent than put your head above the parapet. As a vaccine developer, Dr. Gupta has connections with a pharmaceutical start-up, but Dr. Bhattacharya and I are among the few drug/vaccine scientists who purposely avoid pharmaceutical company funding to be free from conflicts of interests.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. mark
    Member

    The Great Barrington nonsense was definitely sponsored by AIER. They admitted it at the time.

    www.respectfulinsolence.com has extensive documentation on this.

    As for Mr. Griffin, a stopped watch is right twice a day. He's about the last person I'd want to cite on any topic except to show that occasionally Birchers notice something accurately - although not on economics, health care or anything else related to this topic.

    Posted 2 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.