I think you guys should really do this and I'm sure Dz would be cool with it. Scroll down the page on 911blogger and you'll see the banner exaganges with other sites;
http://911blogger.com/dailynews
Here's the rough size that I think it'll need to be;
And this is how it would look, I knocked this up in Photoshop;
We'd love to do this, thanks for the suggestion. Right now, I don't think our link in the huge list gets many hits. We've been wondering how to suggest to 911blogger to narrow down their references or specifically point readers toward the best resources. I know they like to remain neutral, but maybe this would be a good way...
cooperativeresearch.org
911Research.WTC7.net
911revisited.com
911review.com
911proof.com
911courage.org
questioning911.com
legitgov.org
v911t.org
Citizens Counter-Coup
911readingroom.org
911busters.com
mujca.com
911truthnow.org
911eyewitness.com
911weknow.com
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
911omissionreport.com
911truthseekers.org
timetowakeup.net
killtown
8thestate.com
ReOpen911.org
9eleven.info
911source.org
911think.com
911tv.org
911.clubivy.org
globalconspiracyvideos.com
whokilledjohnoneill.com/
grandtheftcountry.com
oprah911.com
Youth for 9/11 Truth
truth911.net
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
deceptiondollar.com
team8plus.org
bush911video.com
truthmove.org
Flight77.info
explosive911analysis.com
flight93crash.com
unansweredquestions.org
911blimp.net
emergencynow.info
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
911truthradio.com
supportthetruth.com
mime11.com
oilempire.us
physics911.net
physics911.ca
jonhs.net/911/
nw0.info
comcast.net/~skydrifter
investigate911.com
www.timetowakeup.net
peoplefor911justice.com
www.911truthualbany.org
Give me a 728x90 banner and I'll put into rotation at the top of http://www.abovetopsecret.com We got nearly 1.5 million unique visitors in January.
truthmod Wrote:
We'd love to do this, thanks for the suggestion. Right now, I don't think our link in the huge list gets many hits. We've been wondering how to suggest to 911blogger to narrow down their references or specifically point readers toward the best resources. I know they like to remain neutral, but maybe this would be a good way..
I totally agree there's a bit too much bullshit in that list - 911eyewitness.com, killtown, team8plus.org - to name a few.
We're working on some banner graphics...we'll get back to you soon.
The underlying purpose of a long BS list of sites is a form of peer pressure, in way, pressuring people to accept the swamp of disinfo sites as reasonable because they (the 'authority' of the website) are supporting these bogus sites by linking to them, so the pressure is on anyone who else who doesn't "accept all".
(Just to reiterate, I think the webmasters/editors are sincere, but the bogus sites they link to are not.)
Dem, thanks for the recommendation. You'll notice that 911blogger also finally edited their list of links, getting rid of Team8plus. I hope that people recognize this willingness on their part to address a concern that many had expressed. This is a positive step in the right direction that I hope the websites detractors will acknowledge.
While the admins will admit that they don't all agree on everything, the generally good quality of their posting certainly sets a positive example for those participating. And quite often they will chime in on an issue, and indicate that they are on the logical side of the debate.
TruthMove hasn't got it exactly just right either, but we are trying to show the same kind of adaptivity to people's concerns, while maintaining our strategic priorities. Having a lack of willingness to compromise with our peers, or find the nugget of truth in the ranting of even our most misdirected antagonist, we are simply not participating in the growth of the movement. I've learned a lot from Nico, for instance. Not about the facts of 9/11 truth mind you.
People everywhere are into this. And we have to assume that some will be more creative, or have greater insight. When we discover a better method, or more clear explanation, we must all be willing to learn something new, and be willing to adapt to our understanding and approach. Of course, just as much as we are willing to defend the movement from methods and explanations that undermine our efforts.
truthmover Wrote:
Dem, thanks for the recommendation. You'll notice that 911blogger also finally edited their list of links, getting rid of Team8plus. I hope that people recognize this willingness on their part to address a concern that many had expressed. This is a positive step in the right direction that I hope the websites detractors will acknowledge.
While the admins will admit that they don't all agree on everything, the generally good quality of their posting certainly sets a positive example for those participating. And quite often they will chime in on an issue, and indicate that they are on the logical side of the debate.
TruthMove hasn't got it exactly just right either, but we are trying to show the same kind of adaptivity to people's concerns, while maintaining our strategic priorities. Having a lack of willingness to compromise with our peers, or find the nugget of truth in the ranting of even our most misdirected antagonist, we are simply not participating in the growth of the movement. I've learned a lot from Nico, for instance. Not about the facts of 9/11 truth mind you.
People everywhere are into this. And we have to assume that some will be more creative, or have greater insight. When we discover a better method, or more clear explanation, we must all be willing to learn something new, and be willing to adapt to our understanding and approach. Of course, just as much as we are willing to defend the movement from methods and explanations that undermine our efforts
That looks excellent, and the quote is fantastic to!
You must log in to post.